首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Study of BCS-BEC Crossover Theories above $T_c$: the Nature of the Pseudogap in Ultra-Cold Atomic Fermi Gases
【2h】

Comparative Study of BCS-BEC Crossover Theories above $T_c$: the Nature of the Pseudogap in Ultra-Cold Atomic Fermi Gases

机译:BCs-BEC交叉理论在$ T_c $以上的比较研究:自然   超冷原子费米气体中的pseudogap

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents a comparison of two finite-temperature BCS-Bose Einsteincondensation (BEC) crossover theories above the transition temperature:Nozieres Schmitt-Rink (NSR) theory and finite $T$-extended BCS-Leggett theory.The comparison is cast in the form of numerical studies of the behavior of thefermionic spectral function both theoretically and as constrained by(primarily) radio frequency (RF) experiments. Both theories include pairfluctuations and exhibit pseudogap effects, although the nature of thispseudogap is very different. The pseudogap in finite $T$-extended BCS-Leggetttheory is found to follow a BCS-like dispersion which, in turn, is associatedwith a broadened BCS-like self energy, rather more similar to what is observedin high temperature superconductors (albeit, for a d-wave case). The fermionicquasi-particle dispersion is different in NSR theory and the damping isconsiderably larger. We argue that the two theories are appropriate indifferent temperature regimes with the BCS-Leggett approach more suitablenearer to condensation. There should, in effect, be little difference at higher$T$ as the pseudogap becomes weaker and where the simplifying approximationsused in the BCS-Leggett approach break down. On the basis ofmomentum-integrated radio frequency studies of unpolarized gases, it would bedifficult to distinguish which theory is the better. A full comparison forpolarized gases is not possible since there is claimed to be inconsistencies inthe NSR approach (not found in the BCS-Leggett scheme). Future experimentsalong the lines of momentum resolved experiments look to be very promising indistinguishing the two theories.
机译:本文对两种高于转变温度的有限温度BCS-玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚(BEC)交叉理论进行了比较:Nozieres Schmitt-Rink(NSR)理论和有限的$ T $-扩展BCS-Leggett理论。理论上和受(主要)射频(RF)实验约束的铁离子光谱函数行为数值研究的一种形式。两种理论都包括成对涨落,并表现出伪间隙效应,尽管这种伪装的性质非常不同。发现在有限的$ T $扩展的BCS-Leggetttheory中的伪间隙遵循类似BCS的色散,这又与扩大的BCS般的自能量有关,这与在高温超导体中观察到的相似(尽管对于d波情况)。在NSR理论中,费米离子准粒子的色散是不同的,并且阻尼很大。我们认为这两种理论都适用于不同的温度范围,而BCS-Leggett方法更适合冷凝。实际上,随着伪间隙变弱以及在BCS-Leggett方法中使用的简化近似值被分解,在较高的T $处应该没有什么差别。在对非极化气体进行动量积分的射频研究的基础上,很难区分哪种理论更好。由于据称在NSR方法中存在不一致之处(在BCS-Leggett方案中未发现),因此无法对极化气体进行全面比较。在动量解析实验的范围之内,未来的实验看起来很有希望将两种理论区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号